Sunshine Anderson - Heard it All before

As alternative music fell over itself in a headlong dash towards the mainstream this decade, one of the unfortunate side effects was that mainstream pop music adopted some of the worst aspects of the indie sector. In 2009 (which is, remember, all about pop) Britain is rife with artists that combine the pumped-up piety and creative ‘seriousness’ of old indie with the principle-less commerciality and childish simplicity of the lesser pop song. I don’t like to name names, but actually, I will, so here goes: Florence and the Machine, Little Boots, La Roux.

This is an unfortunate turn of events, because pop has always thrived on ephemerality and anti-seriousness, has always benefitted enormously from the celebration of short-lived, attention-grabbing anomalies over album-length pretention. What’s weird about the three artists mentioned above is that they just don’t seem to have any singles worthy of note. In this age of plummeting CD sales, it is, bizarrely, their albums that have been heavily marketed, which looks very much a desperate last attempt by the record industry to appeal to the few people still buying physical copy (ie. twenty/thirty-something Mondeo women).

You get the feeling that if Sunshine Anderson’s ‘Heard it All Before’ was released today, instead of it being a rare, unique, transitory pop gem, it would most likely be positioned in the vanguard of a similarly obvious and cheap marketing strategy. As it is, we can thank our lucky stars it appeared in 2001, just before records by soul/pop-influenced female solo artists started sounding like they were designed by a committee consisting of Bernard Butler, Jo Whiley, and the Chief Executive of one of the ‘cooler’ offshoots of the Universal Music Group. Read the rest of this entry »

Girls Aloud

‘Pop’…

WHAT DOES THIS WORD MEAN?!

A commercially successful music? All post-1950s popular music? Music that expresses simple populist sentiments? A classic formula, as in ‘the perfect pop song’? A 3-minute tune based around a hook? A melody the milkman can whistle? The Ronettes? The Beatles? The Buzzcocks? Take That? Pink? The Kaiser Chiefs? Little Boots? N-fucking-Dubz?

In the noughties, this percussive monosyllable was thrown around with such indiscriminate abandon in so many disparate contexts that it became an almost completely meaningless tag.  Writing at the close of the decade, it feels like there has never before in the history of humanity been so much confusion surrounding a generic label (I know someone in the music industry who said at the start of this year that 2009 would be ‘all about pop’, so there you go, he should know I suppose).

Traditionally of course (or at least since the mid to late-sixties), one of the ways in which the word ‘pop’ was defined was as a negative term for a music that prioritized sales and accessibility over artistry and principles, a way of evoking a soulless beyond-the-pale place that ‘serious musicians’ should never wander into. For all the exceptions to the rule down the years – punk’s vigorous rejection of musical complexity, Morrissey and Marr’s dedication to ‘classic pop’ – this was a sentiment that pretty much stuck. Read the rest of this entry »

 

©2009–2010 The Grain